Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: > Thank you ! About performance, this current port is slower than the > original Linux code, because it adds a few malloc() that could be > avoided I guess. The problem is I don't know how to use the locking > systems. I'm guessing this port doesn't make any use of the zone allocator? If not, significant performance could likely be gained by using it as opposed to simply kmalloc(9). -- Ryan Sommers ryans_at_gamersimpact.comReceived on Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:03:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:18 UTC