On Monday 25 October 2004 20:49, Scott Long wrote: In this case the subject are very pooly reflects what the actual issues it should most likely have read "help: I am having very poor performance in the ATA subsystem (any nobody else seems to)" I am still pussled about why excatly the performance is a it is with this setup - but like eveybody else where english is not our native tongue it some time comes across a bit hasher than it should - The problem seen by Fandino are weird - any I am sure that FreeBSD not judged by it > > Well, RAID-0 is a special case =-) That said, putting discrete RAID > classes into the GEOM layer is something of a new adventure, so I'm > not surprised to hear about performance problems, even in RAID-0. > There might be extra data copies or path latencies that weren't planned > for or expected. It's definitely something to look at. But it's also > a very new subsystem, so it would be unfair to judge FreeBSD performance > with it. > > Scott > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Mon Oct 25 2004 - 18:12:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:19 UTC