Re: taskqueue(9) funny

From: Bruce M Simpson <bms_at_spc.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:13:16 -0700

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 12:57:43PM -0500, Sam wrote:
> There is no task_fn type defined by taskqueue.h or _task.h.
> >From a documentation perspective this is ever-so-mildly
> deceiving.

This must mean task_fn_t. How about the attached patch?

BMS

P.S. Love the way mail user agents still escape lines beginning with
'From' even in 2004 because of good old mbox mail format.

text/plain attachment: taskqueue.9.diff

Received on Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:13:33 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stephan Uphoff: "Re: number of CPUs and IPI panic"
Previous message: Sam: "taskqueue(9) funny"
In reply to: Sam: "taskqueue(9) funny"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:19 UTC