On Thursday 28 October 2004 10:08 am, you wrote: > On Thursday 28 October 2004 05:15, you wrote: > > uhci0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 3 at device > > 17.2 on pci0 > > uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > usb0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci0 > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > uhub1: Texas Instruments TUSB2046 hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/1.25, addr > > 2 uhub1: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > > uhci1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 3 at device > > 17.3 on pci0 > > uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > usb1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci1 > > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > > uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > uhci2: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 3 at device > > 17.4 on pci0 > > uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > usb2: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci2 > > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > > uhub3: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > > uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > > > This patch causes problems with my system and plugging in usb devices, > > they are most of the time not detected. > > It could be that this patch causes you problems, but to know for sure > and to find out where it's going wrong I need more information. Could > you please be more specific in what you could do without the patch, and > what doesn't work with the patch? > > Can you provide the dmesg log events of a kernel with and without the > patch and show what you think goes wrong there? > > thanks, > Daan Well I guess it must have been some freak occurance since I tried the patch again today and everything seems to be working. -- Anish Mistry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC