Re: kern/73000: UHCI driver fails to detect (certain) interrupts on boot

On Thursday 28 October 2004 20:15, you wrote:
> On Thursday 28 October 2004 10:08 am, you wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 October 2004 05:15, you wrote:
> > > uhci0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 3 at device
> > > 17.2 on pci0
> > > uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
> > > usb0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci0
> > > usb0: USB revision 1.0
> > > uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> > > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
> > > uhub1: Texas Instruments TUSB2046 hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/1.25, addr
> > > 2 uhub1: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered
> > > uhci1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 3 at device
> > > 17.3 on pci0
> > > uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED]
> > > usb1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci1
> > > usb1: USB revision 1.0
> > > uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> > > uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
> > > uhci2: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 3 at device
> > > 17.4 on pci0
> > > uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED]
> > > usb2: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci2
> > > usb2: USB revision 1.0
> > > uhub3: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> > > uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
> > >
> > > This patch causes problems with my system and plugging in usb devices,
> > > they are most of the time not detected.
> >
> > It could be that this patch causes you problems, but to know for sure
> > and to find out where it's going wrong I need more information. Could
> > you please be more specific in what you could do without the patch, and
> > what doesn't work with the patch?
> >
> > Can you provide the dmesg log events of a kernel with and without the
> > patch and show what you think goes wrong there?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Daan
>
> Well I guess it must have been some freak occurance since I tried the patch
> again today and everything seems to be working.
Ok, thanks for trying the patch again. It would have wonderd me if the patch 
killed something, since the patch handles more interrupts, not less. But 
having it verified on more machines is always a good thing.

grtz,
Daan