On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 20:58, Scott Long wrote: > All, > > In the interest of getting RELENG_5 stable and ready for 5.3, we are > going to switch the scheduler in 6-CURRENT from SCHED_ULE to SCHED_4BSD. > Tests are showing that the 4BSD is a bit more stable under load than > ULE, and is a LOT morestable than ULE with PREEMPTION enabled. This > does not mean that ULE is being removed or that we have lost confidence > in the direction and features of ULE. By changing this we can focus on > stability for the rest of the RELENG_5 cycle. I'd encourage anyone who > is interested in the ULE scheduler to talk to Julian Elischer and Jeff > Roberson about what needs to be done with it. Once 5.3 is released we > can look at switching 6-CURRENT back to ULE if it makes sense. > > Scott Wouldn't it make sense to have them list what needs to be done with it somewhere?Received on Tue Sep 07 2004 - 19:14:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:10 UTC