Andreas Kohn wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 22:58, Scott Long wrote: > >>All, >> >>In the interest of getting RELENG_5 stable and ready for 5.3, we are >>going to switch the scheduler in 6-CURRENT from SCHED_ULE to SCHED_4BSD. > > Wouldn't it make more sense to only switch in RELENG_5, and leave it as > default in HEAD? > Or would it complicate testing and current work too much? > > Regards, > Andreas > > (This questions basically comes from an interest in good QA and RE > practices) > We are trying to keep HEAD as a good test-bed for future RELENG_5 fixes. It's hard to get broad testing of scheduler related things if HEAD and RELENG_5 are using different schedulers. We also want to see HEAD be stable enough to develop and test non-scheduler related things too. ScottReceived on Tue Sep 07 2004 - 20:07:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:10 UTC