On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 00:04, Scott Long wrote: > Andreas Kohn wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 22:58, Scott Long wrote: > > > >>All, > >> > >>In the interest of getting RELENG_5 stable and ready for 5.3, we are > >>going to switch the scheduler in 6-CURRENT from SCHED_ULE to SCHED_4BSD. > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense to only switch in RELENG_5, and leave it as > > default in HEAD? > > Or would it complicate testing and current work too much? > > > > Regards, > > Andreas > > > > (This questions basically comes from an interest in good QA and RE > > practices) > > > > We are trying to keep HEAD as a good test-bed for future RELENG_5 fixes. > It's hard to get broad testing of scheduler related things if HEAD and > RELENG_5 are using different schedulers. We also want to see HEAD be > stable enough to develop and test non-scheduler related things too. > > Scott Ah, thank you. -- Andreas
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:10 UTC