On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 08:44:12PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 06:51:56PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > >>I've fixed 'ipfw tee' in 6-current. Please try it and report back. This > >>is pretty useful for passive packet monitoring. > >> > > > >Just to make it crystal clear for everyone, the tee'd fragments are > >still reassembled into a full packet before the diversion, correct? > > No, they are not. Only diverted packets are reassembled, tee'd packet > are not. > Then at least the divert(4) manpage should be updated to document the difference in behavior (between "divert" and "tee"). Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:11 UTC