Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 08:44:12PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >>Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> >>>On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 06:51:56PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I've fixed 'ipfw tee' in 6-current. Please try it and report back. This >>>>is pretty useful for passive packet monitoring. >>>> >>> >>>Just to make it crystal clear for everyone, the tee'd fragments are >>>still reassembled into a full packet before the diversion, correct? >> >>No, they are not. Only diverted packets are reassembled, tee'd packet >>are not. >> > > Then at least the divert(4) manpage should be updated to document the > difference in behavior (between "divert" and "tee"). Under BUGS the ipfw(8) man page now says only 'divert' will reassemble the packet. The old version said both do it. So I've changed that and removed 'tee' from it. Other than that there is no reference to this (non-)behaviour anywhere in that man page. -- AndreReceived on Mon Sep 13 2004 - 17:01:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:11 UTC