On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 03:21:52PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:56:21AM +0900, Rob wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > The manpages of ipfw needs modification with respect to > > the IPFW vs.IPFW2 discussion. > > All this is quite misleading when 5.3 becomes stable. > > > Do you mean you want the IPFW vs. IPFW2 information to be > removed from the manpage? If yes, I don't support this. > There will be a lot of people switching from 4.x to 5.x, > and it can be helpful for them. We can remove this in > future releases though. He probably means that the references to -STABLE in the manpage needs to be changed to say 4.x instead (and the references to -CURRENT probably should say 5.x instead), since when 5.3 becomes stable it will no longer be true that -STABLE uses IPFW as default (which is what the manpage says.) -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013_at_student.uu.seReceived on Sun Sep 19 2004 - 10:31:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:12 UTC