On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 05:07:38AM +0100, Doug Barton wrote: > > There are many differences between BIND 8 and 9. Some of the more > important ones are how picky BIND 9 is about zone file format. Some > zones that loaded fine under BIND 8 will not load with 9. The named For example, new bind9 do not understand such kind of records: use.exit.to.quit.nslookup.-.- A 192.168.2.2 quit IN CNAME use.exit.to.quit.nslookup.-.- Sep 24 22:20:56 ns named[52308]: toxa.lan:22: use.exit.to.quit.nslookup.-.-.toxa.lan: bad owner name (check-names) Sep 24 22:20:56 ns /kernel: Sep 24 22:20:56 ns named[52308]: toxa.lan:22: use.exit.to.quit.nslookup.-.-.toxa.lan: bad owner name (check-names) Sep 24 22:20:56 ns named[52308]: zone toxa.lan/IN: loading master file toxa.lan: bad owner name (check-names) Sep 24 22:20:56 ns /kernel: Sep 24 22:20:56 ns named[52308]: zone toxa.lan/IN: loading master file toxa.lan: bad owner name (check-names) Removing "-" works ok: use.exit.to.quit.nslookup A 192.168.2.2 quit IN CNAME use.exit.to.quit.nslookup Old bind was not so strict about it :-)Received on Sat Sep 25 2004 - 02:53:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:13 UTC