On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT), Doug Barton <dougb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > I think you missed the part of my previous message where I talked about > how the current system offers the maximum in terms of features and > flexibility. No, not at all. > That same man page then defines the behavior for SIGINT and SIGTERM. > Killing named with a signal in this case is harmless, and should be > functionally equivalent to 'rndc stop', except in those cases where rndc > is buggered for some reason. Yebbut... hows does that justify ignoring the vendor supplied directions for the software in question? We're supposed to use rndc, not signals. > You might want to follow up with this question on > freebsd-rc_at_freebsd.org. Noted, thanks. -- JuhaReceived on Tue Sep 28 2004 - 10:13:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC