Re: Proper way to run bind9

From: Doug Barton <DougB_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Juha Saarinen wrote:

>> That same man page then defines the behavior for SIGINT and SIGTERM.
>> Killing named with a signal in this case is harmless, and should be
>> functionally equivalent to 'rndc stop', except in those cases where rndc
>> is buggered for some reason.
>
> Yebbut...  hows does that justify ignoring the vendor supplied
> directions for the software in question? We're supposed to use rndc,
> not signals.

How about this. I promise that if there is ever a day when what is 
happening now DOESN'T work, I will fix it. Sound like a deal?

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection
Received on Tue Sep 28 2004 - 11:46:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC