On Tuesday 28 September 2004 06:57 am, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday 27 September 2004 09:34 pm, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > >>Robert Watson wrote: > >>>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > >>>>Does anybody know what is panic: sorele? :) > >>> > >>>It's the result of an inconsistency detected by the kernel regarding > >>>kernel invariants for sockets. The somewhat uninformative nature of the > >>>message is historical, and should probably be fixed. If this is > >>>reproduceable, could you rebuild your kernel with INVARIANTS support, as > >>>well as DDB so you can generate a stack trace and other debugging > >>>information (or, if you have a core, could you use gdb to extract > >>>debugging information per the Handbook?) > >> > >>I am not able to compile the kernel with DDB and INVARIANTS either... > >>When I put these options to kernel conf, I get this error > >> > >>Options Added: > >> > >>options INVARIANTS > >>options KDB > >>options DDB > > > > INVARIANTS requires the option 'INVARIANT_SUPPORT'. > > Good point, one sometimes wonders why options INVARIANTS doesnt > automatically include options INVARIANT_SUPPORT :) So you can build a kernel with INVARIANT_SUPPORT but no INVARIANTS but still build modules with INVARIANTS. Useful when working on a device driver for example. I think the dependency there is noted in sys/conf/NOTES btw. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Tue Sep 28 2004 - 13:43:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC