John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 27 September 2004 09:34 pm, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > >>Robert Watson wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Evren Yurtesen wrote: >>> >>>>Does anybody know what is panic: sorele? :) >>> >>>It's the result of an inconsistency detected by the kernel regarding >>>kernel invariants for sockets. The somewhat uninformative nature of the >>>message is historical, and should probably be fixed. If this is >>>reproduceable, could you rebuild your kernel with INVARIANTS support, as >>>well as DDB so you can generate a stack trace and other debugging >>>information (or, if you have a core, could you use gdb to extract >>>debugging information per the Handbook?) >> >>I am not able to compile the kernel with DDB and INVARIANTS either... >>When I put these options to kernel conf, I get this error >> >>Options Added: >> >>options INVARIANTS >>options KDB >>options DDB > > > INVARIANTS requires the option 'INVARIANT_SUPPORT'. > Good point, one sometimes wonders why options INVARIANTS doesnt automatically include options INVARIANT_SUPPORT :) Another thing is that there is so little information about what is needed in handbook(at least I couldnt find) and not even in sample config files so... But thanks, now it seems like compiling... I will just try to get a dump of the kernel when it crash EvrenReceived on Mon Sep 27 2004 - 22:57:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC