Re: HEADS UP: named now runs chroot'ed by default

From: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd_at_pelleg.org>
Date: 29 Sep 2004 09:26:07 -0400
Doug Barton <DougB_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:

> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Peter Schultz wrote:
> 
> > Why not do it FreeBSD style and auto-jail named?
> 
> The simplest answer is that not every host can burn (or even obtain) an
> extra IP address for the jail. It's also questionable what additional
> benefit would be obtained.
> 

Benefit question aside, it's possible to run the jail on a RFC1918 address,
and run NAT on the host to make that fact transparent. A ugly hack, but it
definitely works.

-- 

  Dan Pelleg
Received on Wed Sep 29 2004 - 11:26:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC