Doug Barton <DougB_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Peter Schultz wrote: > > > Why not do it FreeBSD style and auto-jail named? > > The simplest answer is that not every host can burn (or even obtain) an > extra IP address for the jail. It's also questionable what additional > benefit would be obtained. > Benefit question aside, it's possible to run the jail on a RFC1918 address, and run NAT on the host to make that fact transparent. A ugly hack, but it definitely works. -- Dan PellegReceived on Wed Sep 29 2004 - 11:26:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC