Re: Interrupt storm

From: Dan Cojocar <dan.cojocar_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:56:01 +0300
On Apr 2, 2005 2:18 PM, Gleb Kurtsov <k-gleb_at_yandex.ru> wrote:
> On (31/03/2005 21:38), Dan Cojocar wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:27 -0800, Nate Lawson <nate_at_root.org> wrote:
> > > Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:48 -0500 (EST), Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I tried running GENERIC and i get the following lor and watchdog
> > > >>>> timeout, no interrupt storms:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --- 8< --- <snip> --- 8< ---
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>   Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.generic
> > > >>>>   I tried also my kernel with apic, i don't get interrupt storms but
> > > >>>> i get watchdog timeout message just like with GENERIC.
> > > >>>> Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.apic
> > > >>>>   And finally i tried my kernel without apic and without acpi, it's
> > > >>>> running just fine, no interrupt storms, no watchdog timeout, but i
> > > >>>> don't have acpi :(, here is the final
> > > >>>> dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.noacpi.
> if you want to get acpi you have to use old acpi pci link code.
> cd sys/dev/acpica; cvs update -D 23-Nov-2004 -Pd acpi_pci[^.]*
> it works fine for me with recent current.
   Thank you Gleb, i will try your suggestion.
          Dan
Received on Sat Apr 02 2005 - 12:56:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC