Re: Interrupt storm

Gleb Kurtsov wrote:
> On (31/03/2005 21:38), Dan Cojocar wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:27 -0800, Nate Lawson <nate_at_root.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:48 -0500 (EST), Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I tried running GENERIC and i get the following lor and watchdog
>>>>>>>timeout, no interrupt storms:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--- 8< --- <snip> --- 8< ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.generic
>>>>>>>  I tried also my kernel with apic, i don't get interrupt storms but
>>>>>>>i get watchdog timeout message just like with GENERIC.
>>>>>>>Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.apic
>>>>>>>  And finally i tried my kernel without apic and without acpi, it's
>>>>>>>running just fine, no interrupt storms, no watchdog timeout, but i
>>>>>>>don't have acpi :(, here is the final
>>>>>>>dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.noacpi.
> 
> if you want to get acpi you have to use old acpi pci link code.
> cd sys/dev/acpica; cvs update -D 23-Nov-2004 -Pd acpi_pci[^.]* 
> it works fine for me with recent current.

I'm a little confused.  I don't know of anyone that has problems with 
the 6-current PCI irq code that works on 5-stable (which is what your 
cvs command updates it to).

Do either of you have a problem with irq routing on 6-current that works 
on 5-stable?  Please send details if so.

-- 
Nate