Re: Interrupt storm

On Apr 2, 2005 10:27 PM, Nate Lawson <nate_at_root.org> wrote:
> Gleb Kurtsov wrote:
> > On (31/03/2005 21:38), Dan Cojocar wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:27 -0800, Nate Lawson <nate_at_root.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:48 -0500 (EST), Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I tried running GENERIC and i get the following lor and watchdog
> >>>>>>>timeout, no interrupt storms:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>--- 8< --- <snip> --- 8< ---
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.generic
> >>>>>>>  I tried also my kernel with apic, i don't get interrupt storms but
> >>>>>>>i get watchdog timeout message just like with GENERIC.
> >>>>>>>Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.apic
> >>>>>>>  And finally i tried my kernel without apic and without acpi, it's
> >>>>>>>running just fine, no interrupt storms, no watchdog timeout, but i
> >>>>>>>don't have acpi :(, here is the final
> >>>>>>>dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.noacpi.
> >
> > if you want to get acpi you have to use old acpi pci link code.
> > cd sys/dev/acpica; cvs update -D 23-Nov-2004 -Pd acpi_pci[^.]*
> > it works fine for me with recent current.
> 
> I'm a little confused.  I don't know of anyone that has problems with
> the 6-current PCI irq code that works on 5-stable (which is what your
> cvs command updates it to).
> 
> Do either of you have a problem with irq routing on 6-current that works
> on 5-stable?  Please send details if so.
  Hello Nate,
 I'm not using now -stable but i did have for a short period stable
installed and i remember that i didn't have any interrupt storm.
 Maybe i will try to install a -stable version again to see if i
remember correct.
 Thanks,
         Dan