Re: GEOM architecture and the (lack of) need for foot-shooting

From: Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:14:15 -0600 (MDT)

The tools we have suck in many ways.  No one disputes that.  Rather
than flame people, I'm going to work within the GEOM framework to see
if the glaring deficiencies in the kernel/userland APIs can be
corrected.  If I come up with anything I'll let people know.

Warner

Received on Thu Apr 07 2005 - 21:15:07 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc"
Previous message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64"
In reply to: Andrey Chernov: "Re: GEOM architecture and the (lack of) need for foot-shooting"
Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: GEOM architecture and the (lack of) need for foot-shooting"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC