"Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd_at_over-yonder.net> wrote: >> Mounting File Systems ... [ok] >> Starting xl0 ... [ok] > > This is something I've always found somewhat ironic, actually. I'm > not really sure overall whether I like it or not, but it IS very > structured and consistent. The irony is that I find the Linux kernel > bootup messages to be an insane mishmash that I can never sort > ANYTHING out of, relative to FreeBSD's very neat and structured kernel > probes. So maybe an OS is only allowed to be neat in one of the two > 8-} I think restructuring our userland boot message would be a good start. I'm not talking about the above proposal, even if I think it's nice (but a little bit too terse for me), I'm talking about rethinking the actual (since the new rc system) clutter. The 4.x startup looks structured (it could be improved to be more eye friendly, but the beauty lies in the eye of the beholder), while the 5+ one is neither fish nor meat. It's a mixture of the 4.x one with the "Starting xyz" messages from the new system. Since we don't try to keep the new system diff friendly with the NetBSD source anymore, I think we could change it to fit our needs. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild _at_ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 Big book, big bore. -- CallimachusReceived on Thu Apr 28 2005 - 07:53:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:33 UTC