On 14/08/2005, at 21:47, Chris Gilbert wrote: > Hi Søren, > > Thanks a bunch for your reply! > > Yea, I thought it may have been a 137GB limitation, I wasn't > positive though. > > Thanks for clearing it up. > > Also, shouldn't we modify the output with a dev_printf or something > of the > like on device init to note this if the drive attached is > 137GB? I've just committed the workaround a few hours ago, it just uses PIO access for locations that need 48bit mode. Let me know if there are problems with it... - SørenReceived on Wed Aug 17 2005 - 14:57:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:41 UTC