Jonathan Noack wrote: > Please don't top post. From the mailing list faq (joke by Randy Bush): > > A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > > On 08/18/05 00:32, Stepan Rakhimov wrote: > >> Michael Nottebrock wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, 17. August 2005 22:01, Stepan Rakhimov wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for your reply, but lastest investigations showed that Kmail >>>> craches with libc.so.6 and works with libc.so.5 only. That's why I >>>> didn't delete the old file as i want to. I think it's not normal >>>> behaviour, is it a known problem or my kde build's problem? >>>> >>>> I have the same problem with Kdevelop, but i cannot use libmap.conf >>>> with >>>> it, ldd says that it is "not a dynamic executable". (Kdevelop's >>>> backtrace is in attachment) >>> >>> >>> /usr/local/bin/kdevelop is a script, the real executable is >>> kdevelop-bin. The kdevelop crash also looks somewhat familiar - are >>> you running kdevelop-3.2.0? If so, consider upgrading to KDE 3.4.2 / >>> KDevelop 3.2.2. >>> >>> Also, if you've updated from FreeBSD 5.x to 6-BETA, you might want to >>> recompile all your installed ports to make sure they all link against >>> the same system libraries. >> >> >> As I've said I have all latest software (kdevelop 3.2.2 and kde 3.4.2) >> >> When I've upgraded from 5.3-release to 6-current I did recompile all >> the ports (it was 4 or 5 months ago) >> >> Is it good solution to manually remove such old files like libc.so.5, >> libpthread.so.1 libc_r.so.5 and make a symlinks to libc.so.6 >> lipthread.so.2 and libc_r.so.6 respectively? >> Since kmail works only with libc.so.5 for me, I'm afraid to get it >> completely broken. > > > Short answer: > Recompile all your ports. > > Long answer: > To see how polluted your binaries/libraries are, install the > sysutils/libchk port and run "libchk -v". You might want to redirect > that to a file as it is quite verbose (note that firefox and thunderbird > produce a lot of noise that can be ignored). The only things that > should be linked to libc.so.5 are 5.x binaries that you downloaded and > didn't compile (e.g., the binary port of 'rar'). If you see more > binaries linked to libc.so.5, you need to recompile all your ports. Once > that is done, you may delete all unreferenced libraries (according to > libchk) OLDER than your last build/install world. Until there is a > misc/compat5x port, I use the following settings in /etc/libmap.conf so > I can delete ALL old libraries (but still allow 'rar' to work): > > # Work with 5.x binaries > libc.so.5 libc.so.6 > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > libstdc++.so.4 libstdc++.so.5 > > Hope that helps, > Jon > I believe you need a mapping for libpthread.so.1 to libpthread.so.2, too. Cheers, PanagiotisReceived on Fri Aug 19 2005 - 13:51:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:41 UTC