On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:22:21PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20050822181740.GD22948_at_odin.ac.hmc.edu> > Brooks Davis <brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net> writes: > : On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:39:40AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > : > - Maybe /etc/pccard_ether should not depend on $removable_interfaces. > : > After all, it does ignore interfaces which are up. Or maybe I'm just > : > bitter because it took me 15 minutes to figure out why the wireless > : > card was not getting setup on resume... ;) > : > : I'm leaning more an more in this direction. I just need some time to > : work on it a bit more. > > Yes. This was definitely an unwise choice. It certainly broke years > of tradition, if nothing else :-). It tripped me up for a period of > time as well, and when I build/install my 'virgin' tree it still trips > me up for a few seconds when I see the behavior that I've dyked out > return. Of course my hammer is big (completely remove > removable_interfaces and replace it with nothing). Fixed in HEAD. :-P I've killed removable_interfaces and added a NOAUTO keyword for those who want to have purely manual control of an interface. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:42 UTC