In message: <20050824014209.GA27924_at_odin.ac.hmc.edu> Brooks Davis <brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net> writes: : On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:22:21PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <20050822181740.GD22948_at_odin.ac.hmc.edu> : > Brooks Davis <brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net> writes: : > : On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:39:40AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: : > : > - Maybe /etc/pccard_ether should not depend on $removable_interfaces. : > : > After all, it does ignore interfaces which are up. Or maybe I'm just : > : > bitter because it took me 15 minutes to figure out why the wireless : > : > card was not getting setup on resume... ;) : > : : > : I'm leaning more an more in this direction. I just need some time to : > : work on it a bit more. : > : > Yes. This was definitely an unwise choice. It certainly broke years : > of tradition, if nothing else :-). It tripped me up for a period of : > time as well, and when I build/install my 'virgin' tree it still trips : > me up for a few seconds when I see the behavior that I've dyked out : > return. Of course my hammer is big (completely remove : > removable_interfaces and replace it with nothing). : : Fixed in HEAD. :-P I've killed removable_interfaces and added a NOAUTO : keyword for those who want to have purely manual control of an interface. You da man! Thanks! WarnerReceived on Wed Aug 24 2005 - 00:51:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:42 UTC