Robert Watson wrote: > > After chatting with Sam Leffler, and being a bit puzzled about the exact > failure mode I was seeing, we concluded I should apply his most recent > atheros and 802.11 patches, and update to the latest HAL. Once I did > this, all was well. I don't know what Sam's plans for merging these is, > but they're what you need. I did not try the new HAL with the old > 802.11 code and driver. The new hal will not work with the existing code in cvs--that's why you need the patches :) I don't intend to commit this hal. There's not been enough feedback and it's already several months out of date (i.e. there are fixes that I want to include in any new hal I commit). That said, the hal is definitely an improvement over what's in cvs and folks should see no regression from using it--so long as the also apply the ath+net80211 patches. SamReceived on Sat Dec 03 2005 - 17:40:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:48 UTC