On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:51:51 -0500 John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > I simply do not see any way to do it with current implementation of > > ampdm(and also viapm, etc) & smbus, without modifying the smb- > > >smbus->smbus driver interface. I may be wrong, but as far as I > > >know, currently it's one > > smb for one driver (smbus_* limitation) > > Hmm, it doesn't specify the child device, just the parent. *sigh* > That's lame. You don't have to call it amdpmsub0 btw, you could just > call it amdpm1 if you wanted and have amdpm1 a child of amdpm0. All > that would need to change for that is the NF2_SUBDEV string and the > DRIVER_MODULE line (it would be DRIVER_MODULE(amdpm, amdpm, ...)). > This has the added advantage that you don't have to patch smbus.c. I remade it as you described - can't understand, why I didn't think about it myself -- iprefetch aiReceived on Fri Dec 09 2005 - 10:36:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:48 UTC