On Friday 09 December 2005 06:36 am, Artemiev Igor wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:51:51 -0500 > > John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > > I simply do not see any way to do it with current implementation of > > > ampdm(and also viapm, etc) & smbus, without modifying the smb- > > > > > > >smbus->smbus driver interface. I may be wrong, but as far as I > > > >know, currently it's one > > > > > > smb for one driver (smbus_* limitation) > > > > Hmm, it doesn't specify the child device, just the parent. *sigh* > > That's lame. You don't have to call it amdpmsub0 btw, you could just > > call it amdpm1 if you wanted and have amdpm1 a child of amdpm0. All > > that would need to change for that is the NF2_SUBDEV string and the > > DRIVER_MODULE line (it would be DRIVER_MODULE(amdpm, amdpm, ...)). > > This has the added advantage that you don't have to patch smbus.c. > > I remade it as you described - can't understand, why I didn't think > about it myself Do you have a final patch at a URL? If so, I'll go ahead and commit it for you. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Fri Dec 09 2005 - 11:54:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:48 UTC