Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc_at_crodrigues.org> writes: > Read-only XFS support has been committed to FreeBSD-CURRENT. > Write access to XFS is not supported at this time. > The XFS for FreeBSD source code is based off of GPL'd sources > provided by SGI. Hm. Does this mean that FreeBSD's XFS implementation is GPL'd like ext2fs is? If so, allow me a question why XFS was chosen in preference to ext3fs? Ext3fs appears to have some advantages, easy migration from and to ext2fs, shrinkable, data journalling, data ordering (write data blocks before the file metadata is written) and so on. I don't mean this should become an advocacy discussion, as XFS surely has advantages, too, real-time capability and so on - but ext2fs is already there and has write support. Just curious. -- Matthias AndreeReceived on Fri Dec 16 2005 - 10:15:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC