Re: XFS (read-only) support committed to CURRENT

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc_at_crodrigues.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:12:28 -0500
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:15:17PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Hm. Does this mean that FreeBSD's XFS implementation is GPL'd like
> ext2fs is? If so, allow me a question why XFS was chosen in preference
> to ext3fs?

Your comment makes no sense.  What does being GPL have to do with
choosing ext2fs vs. XFS?  We ported XFS to FreeBSD because we felt like it,
and it was fun.  ext3fs is irrelevant.

-- 
Craig Rodrigues        
rodrigc_at_crodrigues.org
Received on Fri Dec 16 2005 - 14:12:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC