Re: Re: "Native" journaling file systems?

From: <petre_at_kgb.ro>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 02:19:38 +0200 (EET)
>On 2005-12-19 10:28, Justin Smith <jsmith_at_drexel.edu> wrote:
> Are there any plans to develop UFS3--- i.e., a UFS2 file system with an
> added journal?

>Not sure.

> I've used several journaling file systems in Linux and like the Reiser
> FS except for one MAJOR drawback: When something goes wrong, reiser-fsck
> absolutely sucks at repairing things (Hans Reiser freely admits that but
> says it's never needed because nothing ever goes wrong).

hmmm, reiserfsck --rebuild-tree solved my problems twice; or was it pure
luck ? ;)

>Which is, FYI, absolutely and plainly bullshit.  I've seen Linux machines
>with Reiserfs die and cause major pains for dozens of people.  Hans may be
>a smart guy and a very successful businessman, but this particular
>statement is utter nonsense and I have the scars to prove it.

> A UFS3 might have the same desirable features.

>I can't help with the answer to this :)

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
Received on Mon Dec 19 2005 - 23:19:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC