Re: New cpufreq framework and drivers

From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot_at_poupinou.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:37:58 +0100
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:03:47PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Colin Percival wrote:
> >Nate Lawson wrote:
> >
> >>Hardware drivers are of two types, absolute
> >>and relative.  SpeedStep, Powernow, etc. are absolute drivers in that 
> >>they set the cpu's base frequency.  ACPI throttling, Longrun, etc. are 
> >>relative drivers that reduce the processor's clock to a fraction of 
> >>its current base (i.e., they have an additive effect.)
> >
> >
> >If my first glance at the patch is correct, this would have my laptop (a 
> >1.4GHz
> >Pentium M) reporting the availability of the frequencies 600MHz, 800MHz, 
> >etc.
> >from enhanced speedstep, along with the frequencies 300MHz, 400MHz, 
> >500MHz, and
> >700MHz obtained via 50% clock throttling.
> 
> That is correct.  The code to support relative drivers was removed 
> before posting to give the basic framework more testing before I commit 
> it shortly.  The relative support will go in soon after that code is 
> committed.
> 

But longrun is relative though and can scale voltage.
(And the point that longrun can control frequency itself is imho irrelevant).

-- 
Bruno Ducrot

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.
Received on Wed Feb 02 2005 - 19:38:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:27 UTC