On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:39:22AM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:40:32AM -0900, Andy Firman wrote: > > > > Your comments are disturbing. I run a few 4.10 servers and am getting ready > > for a couple new ones and would like to go with 5.3 stable. > > For a while 5.X was pretty iffy. A number of people who tried it at that > time are still stuck with that impression. IMHO, its unjustified. I hate to post a "me too" but I feel compelled to offer my wholehearted agreement with this statement. I installed a number of 5.3-R machines at my old place of employment. They remain the most stable machines in the company by far. At home I run a 5.3-R machine with a RAID3 volume and a 5.3-STABLE machine with two RAID1 volumes - one of them bootable. Both machines have been flawless with the exception of some bad RAM; obviously not FreeBSD's fault. YMMV, but I've been running 5.x since one of the RCs and I've never had a problem that wasn't my own fault in some way. -SnowReceived on Tue Feb 08 2005 - 14:47:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:27 UTC