Jon Noack wrote: > On 02/09/05 13:59, Miguel Mendez wrote: > >> Someone has posted a link to a newsforge article on the NetBSD lists >> that benchmarks MySQL performance on several systems, you can see it at: >> >> http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/12/27/1243207&from=rss >> >> I don't know how much Linux-specific code there is in MySQL because, >> honestly, I always try to avoid it and go with PostgreSQL, but perhaps >> somebody with more MySQL-fu can fill in the blanks and confirm that the >> better performance seen on Linux systems is due to how the software is >> designed and not so much related to FreeBSD per se. > > > The scalability results look promising. Also, has anyone seen what > effect WITH_PROC_SCOPE_PTH has on performance? > > Jon It's a mixed bag that has been in significant flux over the past 8 months due to threading and scheduling infrastructure sometimes fixing bugs and sometimes introducing new bugs. On the mysql SuperSmack test, the best results I found on a dual 3GHz Xeon were with system scope threads under libpthread. libthr was a close second (though all threads there are process scope by definition) and process scope libpthread was almost as bad as libc_r. However, that was back in August, and I think that much has changed since then. Other, non-mysql tests that I've run recently have shown that process scope libpthread is now the overall winner. It would be nice to come up with a new matrix of results based on scheduler, preemption, thread library, and thread attributes. Now if only I had the 2 days free to do that... ScottReceived on Wed Feb 09 2005 - 22:46:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:28 UTC