On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Scott Long wrote: > > The scalability results look promising. Also, has anyone seen what > > effect WITH_PROC_SCOPE_PTH has on performance? > > It's a mixed bag that has been in significant flux over the past 8 > months due to threading and scheduling infrastructure sometimes fixing > bugs and sometimes introducing new bugs. On the mysql SuperSmack test, > the best results I found on a dual 3GHz Xeon were with system scope > threads under libpthread. libthr was a close second (though all threads > there are process scope by definition) and process scope libpthread was > almost as bad as libc_r. However, that was back in August, and I think > that much has changed since then. Other, non-mysql tests that I've run > recently have shown that process scope libpthread is now the overall > winner. It would be nice to come up with a new matrix of results based > on scheduler, preemption, thread library, and thread attributes. Now if > only I had the 2 days free to do that... David Xu's recent work on threading also looks very promising, and in his benchmarks seemed to substantially outperform MySQL running linuxthreads, libkse, libthr, and libc_r on FreeBSD. I recently set him up with a dual Xeon box to use in the netperf cluster as he was previously benchmarking only on PIII hardware. Robert N M WatsonReceived on Wed Feb 09 2005 - 23:02:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:28 UTC