Maxim Konovalov wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, 10:32+0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote: > > >>S?ren Schmidt wrote: >> >> >>>http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-releng5.gz >>>http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-current.gz >>>http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.tar.gz >> >>New version available for testing: >> >>http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.diff-releng5.gz >>http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.diff-current.gz >>http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.tar.gz >> >>This time the diff must be reapplied as there are new changes in there. > > > atadisk.ko and atapicd.ko still do not depend on atapci.ko. So if you > don't ask to load atapci.ko in loader.conf you will get a panic > because the kernel won't find the root fs. I added MODULE_DEPEND() on > atapci macro to ata-disk.c and this solved the problem. Perhaps this > is just a feature. Yes its a feature, if you make everything depend on each other there is no reason to have it as seperate modules... -- -SørenReceived on Thu Feb 17 2005 - 17:36:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:28 UTC