Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Well, it all seems working, but the performance is not proportional to > the "frequency". I am attaching the results of testing. The fist column > is value of freq and the second is the transfer rate from dd to md5. > > FWIW, when I did have TCC working I had 31 freq_levels, but if I set the > freq below about 200, my system freezes and requires a hard power > cycle. I am running ULE but no PREEMPTION. The exact point at which it > locks up is not consistent. Please cvsup and test. I imported a bugfixed version of p4tcc. I've run an R32 at 50 Mhz, no problems. -- NateReceived on Wed Feb 23 2005 - 18:26:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:29 UTC