Re: netgraph(4) initialization order

Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:

> Scott Long wrote:
> 
>> Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Hackers,
>>>
>>> any objections to the attached patch?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, as I stated in another email, I think that the core netgraph
>> module should be initialized before the SI_SUB_DRIVERS step.  I
>> propose creating a new sysinit called SI_SUB_NETGRAPH with a value
>> of 0x30100000.  That way it comes after SI_SUB_IF and before
>> SI_SUB_DRIVERS.  This make fiddling with SI_ORDER_* unneccesary.
> 
> 
> how about new attached patch?
> 
> thanks,
> max
> 

Exactly what I had in mind =-)  Have you tested this out to make sure
it fixes the problem cases?

Scott