Re: netgraph(4) initialization order

From: Roman Kurakin <rik_at_cronyx.ru>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:16:00 +0300
Scott Long:

> Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
>
>> Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Hackers,
>>>>
>>>> any objections to the attached patch?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, as I stated in another email, I think that the core netgraph
>>> module should be initialized before the SI_SUB_DRIVERS step.  I
>>> propose creating a new sysinit called SI_SUB_NETGRAPH with a value
>>> of 0x30100000.  That way it comes after SI_SUB_IF and before
>>> SI_SUB_DRIVERS.  This make fiddling with SI_ORDER_* unneccesary.
>>
>>
>> how about new attached patch?
>>
>> thanks,
>> max
>
>
> Exactly what I had in mind =-)  Have you tested this out to make sure
> it fixes the problem cases? 

But this wouldn't save from the same problem it the future.

rik

>
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
Received on Wed Jan 05 2005 - 20:29:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC