Roman Kurakin wrote: > Scott Long: > >> Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: >> >>> Scott Long wrote: >>> >>>> Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Hackers, >>>>> >>>>> any objections to the attached patch? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, as I stated in another email, I think that the core netgraph >>>> module should be initialized before the SI_SUB_DRIVERS step. I >>>> propose creating a new sysinit called SI_SUB_NETGRAPH with a value >>>> of 0x30100000. That way it comes after SI_SUB_IF and before >>>> SI_SUB_DRIVERS. This make fiddling with SI_ORDER_* unneccesary. >>> >>> >>> >>> how about new attached patch? >>> >>> thanks, >>> max >> >> >> >> Exactly what I had in mind =-) Have you tested this out to make sure >> it fixes the problem cases? > > > But this wouldn't save from the same problem it the future. > > rik > What same problem? This ensures that the netgraph core gets initialized before any driver. Keeping it at SI_SUB_DRIVERS and trying to order the it via SI_ORDER_* is risky because you can't guarantee that some other driver won't try to also take SI_ORDER_FIRST. ScottReceived on Wed Jan 05 2005 - 20:33:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC