On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:12:01PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:07:07AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > > > >>On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> > >>>On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > >>> > >>>>It's been a while now and (judging from this list at least), people are > >>>>not complaining about ULE, so maybe (with re_at_ approval) the fix & > >>>>supporting infrastructure could be brought to RELENG_5? > >>>> > >>> > >>>That's not a good idea. I can lock up ULE+PREEMPTION on > > >>This is observed in pre-5.3RELEASE CURRENT, but I thought Jeff has > > >I'm talking about 6-CURRENT. My last kernel/world build is > > Are there plans for assigning more priority/resources on solving this? > Maybe mark it as show-stopper for 5.4? (it's currently not even on the > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html list) No, because the project has no ability to "assign priority/resources". If someone who has is intrested and capable time to work on it, does so in time, then it may be done, if not, it won't. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC