Brooks Davis wrote: >>>>>> It's been a while now and (judging from this list at >>>>>> least), people are not complaining about ULE, so maybe >>>>>> (with re_at_ approval) the fix & supporting infrastructure >>>>>> could be brought to RELENG_5? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's not a good idea. I can lock up ULE+PREEMPTION on >> >>>> This is observed in pre-5.3RELEASE CURRENT, but I thought Jeff >>>> has >> >>> I'm talking about 6-CURRENT. My last kernel/world build is >> >> Are there plans for assigning more priority/resources on solving >> this? Maybe mark it as show-stopper for 5.4? (it's currently not >> even on the http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html list) > > > No, because the project has no ability to "assign > priority/resources". If someone who has is intrested and capable time > to work on it, does so in time, then it may be done, if not, it > won't. > > -- Brooks Should we take this to mean that none of the developers are interested in ULE any more? That's the general feeling I get these days. Just curious. Richard Coleman rcoleman_at_criticalmagic.comReceived on Wed Jan 12 2005 - 15:44:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC