Ivan Voras wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:07:07AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's been a while now and (judging from this list at least), people >>>>> are not complaining about ULE, so maybe (with re_at_ approval) the fix >>>>> & supporting infrastructure could be brought to RELENG_5? >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's not a good idea. I can lock up ULE+PREEMPTION on > > >>> This is observed in pre-5.3RELEASE CURRENT, but I thought Jeff has > > >> I'm talking about 6-CURRENT. My last kernel/world build is > > > Are there plans for assigning more priority/resources on solving this? > Maybe mark it as show-stopper for 5.4? (it's currently not even on the > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html list) Assigning priorities and resources really is at the will of the developers. Very few are paid to do this work, and none are paid by the release engineering or core groups. The release engineers can put items on the todo list in hopes that it will inspire others to help. Specifically for ULE, since it is not the default scheduler, it will not be making the showstopper list for 5.4. If someone would like to step forward and work on ULE full time, that would be wonderful and I'd highly encourage it. ScottReceived on Wed Jan 12 2005 - 16:37:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC