On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:23:08AM -0800, Ben Becker wrote: > [Laptop]--------(sis0)-[FreeBSD Bridge]-(ath0)--------[FreeBSD AP] > > There seems to be a problem with bridging ath0 and sis0. I have 1 IP > assigned to ath0 which is 192.168.1.3, and I've sysctl'd > 'net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1' and > 'net.link.ether.bridge.config=ath0,sis0'. From the bridge, I can ping > the AP (192.168.1.1) and the laptop (192.168.1.5). However I can't > ping from the laptop to the AP or from the AP to the laptop. Hi, Have you tried ng_bridge(4)? My own experience is similar with yours, and the problem like yours is sovled via ng_bridge(4). Example scripts to setup ng_bridge(4) is at /usr/share/examples/netgraph/ether.bridge. My setup is: [Desktop]------(ed0)-[freebsd bridge]-(fxp0)----[LAN] With bridge(4), the Desktop is able to access the LAN, but not the bridge. No response at all. With ng_bridge(4), both LAN and the freebsd bridge are accessible. The freebsd bridge is -current, and NICs above are: fxp0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VE Ethernet> port 0x8000-0x803f mem 0xc0201000-0xc0201fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci2 ed0: <LEMEL LM-N89TX> at port 0x4000-0x401f irq 11 function 0 config 16 on pccard0 BTW, bridge(4) performance is better than ng_bridge(4). Cheers, -- Clive Tong-I Lin | http://tongi.org | PGP KeyID: A008C03EReceived on Thu Jan 13 2005 - 05:50:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC