On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:50:03 +0800, Clive Lin <clive_at_tongi.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:23:08AM -0800, Ben Becker wrote: > > [Laptop]--------(sis0)-[FreeBSD Bridge]-(ath0)--------[FreeBSD AP] > > > > There seems to be a problem with bridging ath0 and sis0. I have 1 IP > > assigned to ath0 which is 192.168.1.3, and I've sysctl'd > > 'net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1' and > > 'net.link.ether.bridge.config=ath0,sis0'. From the bridge, I can ping > > the AP (192.168.1.1) and the laptop (192.168.1.5). However I can't > > ping from the laptop to the AP or from the AP to the laptop. > > Hi, > > Have you tried ng_bridge(4)? My own experience is similar with > yours, and the problem like yours is sovled via ng_bridge(4). Example > scripts to setup ng_bridge(4) is at > /usr/share/examples/netgraph/ether.bridge. > Thank you for the idea, but there are still problems that appear to be related to net80211 or the ath driver. I did get a little further in debugging this with ng_bridge, though. Packets from the remote computer actually go through the bridge and get to the AP. I enabled debug mode for ath0 on the AP(ifconfig ath0 debug), and here's what I get when I try to send a packet from a remote computer that goes through the bridge (hand transcribed): ath0: station 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b deauthenticate (reason 6) ath0: sending deauth to 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b on channel 11 ath0: station 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b disassociate (reason 7) ath0: sending disassoc to 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b on channel 11 ath0: received auth from 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a rssi 22 ath0: sending auth to 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a on channel 11 ath0: station already 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a authenticated ath0: received assoc_req from 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a rssi 24 ath0: sending assoc_resp to 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a on channel 11 ath0: station already 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a associated 00:0c:6e:a7:47:3b is the MAC address of the remote computer's rl0 interface. 00:0b:6b:33:08:1a is the MAC address of the bridge's ath0 interface. It appears as though ath0 on the AP sees the packet, but thinks the remote computer is actually a station that isn't associated. Am I correct here? I'm not very familiar with the net80211 code, but would it be possible to simply allow the AP to receive and transmit packets to/from layer 2 address that aren't necessarily associated? I know Sam recommended tunneling, but I'd like to essentially have a system that works like those Ethernet-to-Wireless bridge devices (i.e. D-Link DWL-810, newer Linksys WAP11). Am I dreaming -- is this even possible? The more I look into it there doesn't seem to be any standard way of creating an 'Ethernet-to-Wireless' bridge. I'd like to hear from the net80211 pros what the best (if any) solution would be for 'Ethernet-to-Wireless' bridging. Thanks for taking the time to hash through all of this!Received on Thu Jan 13 2005 - 21:38:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC