Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:15:47PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > >>On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> >>>>It depends a bit on where we sit: we probably want a neteventd that knows >>>>about this sort of thing and performs unified network interface >>>>management. In the mean time, I just want dhclient launched, because >>>>dhclient already knows about ssid's, link state, etc. >>> >>>We don't neet yet another daemon around for that. >> >>Ah, but we do, because whatever daemon it is needs to provide unified >>management of routing in the presence of multiple DHCP and link locally >>configured network interfaces. I.e., when I'm switching between wireless >>and wired networks, Useful Things Should Happen, and this can't currently >>be properly managed by today's dhclient. Likewise, I want to always have >>link local addresses configured for every network interface, and not have >>things like dhclient step on them. This requires dhclient to become >>substantially more mature and/or grow a lot, or it requires a new daemon. >>Having many daemons is just asking for them all to step on each other's >>toes, adding and removing addresses and routes in ways that leaves me with >>nothing useful to network with, requiring user intervention. If you've >>ever used a FreeBSD box in this scenario, followed by a Mac OS X box, >>you'll know what I mean. Neither is perfect, but the one with centralized >>configuration management does a much better job :-). > > > FWIW, Sam's got a port of openbsd's dhclient in perforce. It's > apparently significantly less foobar then ours. Unfortunatly, dhclient > isn't enough because we also need wpa_supplication for modern wireless > networks (it also provides basic 802.1x support for wired interfaces in > linux and we'll probably want that too.) I think we'll be able to > simply add a wpa_supplicant_ifs="..." variable to start wpa_supplicant > independent of dhclient, but I'm not 100% sure yet. I auto-start wpa_supplicant from the /etc/start_if.foo script. The only trick is you need to force LD_LIBRARY_PATH to collect libdnet.so from where ports installs it. SamReceived on Tue Jan 25 2005 - 20:38:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC