Re: Suspend broken ?

On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 11:01 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday 09 July 2005 04:10 pm, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 15:17 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > I think you just need to remove the extra { after the if statement on
> > > line 539 at the end of the line.
> >
> > This and changing timer0_max_real_count to timer0_real_max_count made it
> > compilable.
> >
> > But this time the system is immediately very slow (not just after
> > suspend) and I get this strange error message on startup:
> >
> > calcru: runtime went backwards from 68378390 usec to 67512958 usec for
> > pid 11 (idle: cpu0)
> 
> I had never set timer0_real_max_count. :(  One more time:

This new patch fixes the problem for me.

Thanks