Re: Suspend broken ?

From: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft_at_gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:16:34 +0200
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 11:01 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday 09 July 2005 04:10 pm, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 15:17 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > I think you just need to remove the extra { after the if statement on
> > > line 539 at the end of the line.
> >
> > This and changing timer0_max_real_count to timer0_real_max_count made it
> > compilable.
> >
> > But this time the system is immediately very slow (not just after
> > suspend) and I get this strange error message on startup:
> >
> > calcru: runtime went backwards from 68378390 usec to 67512958 usec for
> > pid 11 (idle: cpu0)
> 
> I had never set timer0_real_max_count. :(  One more time:

This new patch fixes the problem for me.

Thanks
Received on Mon Jul 11 2005 - 17:16:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:38 UTC