On Tuesday 12 July 2005 04:12 pm, Harry Coin wrote: > John, > > I am sincerely appreciative the time you have taken. Your test results > are below. > > I haven't processed everything you've written, but I'm not going to hold > you up waiting as that is going to take a while. > > The code just comments out the line you mentioned. pcm0 loads with ACPI on > in this case. I haven't tested what happens with ACPI off, and have no > easy way to test what will happen with the other non-pnp chips (or other > pnp chips) this driver supports. Ok, thanks. > I suggest you send a copy of your comments to whoever fixes up the > architecture manual, because of evident disagreement regarding best > practice in the isa non-pnp driver detection method (ISA_PNP_PROBE vs. > isa_get_logical_id). Well, I think I've just figured out why it says that (the ACPIxxxx devices), so it looks like I am going to have to go through and fix all the various drivers to use a probe routine if they attach to ACPI. It looks like several drivers attach to acpi that probably don't need to as well (ACPI only enumerates built-in hardware like COM ports, etc. It doesn't enumerate ISA PnP cards). -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Tue Jul 12 2005 - 18:34:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:38 UTC