Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots)

From: Andrey Chernov <ache_at_FreeBSD.ORG>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:40:21 +0400

On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:17:52AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> coverage, it's not necessarily a locking problem.  Out of curiousity, if 
> you take "options PREEMPTION" out, but leave debug.mpsafenet=1, do things 
> change?

I don't have "options PREEMPTION". Is it good to have?

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/

Received on Thu Jul 21 2005 - 22:40:39 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Robert Watson: "Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots)"
Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots)"
In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots)"
Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots)"
Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:39 UTC